Hands-On: Beginning My Star Wars: Old Republic Adventure

Hands-On: Beginning My Star Wars: The Old Republic Adventure


            

“It begs the question, why aren’t you making Knights of the Old Republic 3?” asks one of the developers of the massively multiplayer Star Wars: The Old Republic.

“We are,” he says. “We’re making KOTOR 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 on and on.” In other words, upcoming MMO PC title Star Wars: The Old Republic is meant to stand in for all the sequels that BioWare and LucasArts otherwise would have made for their acclaimed Star Wars role-playing games. That’s a tall order, because it means BioWare is attempting to satisfy not only the fans who want to explore sprawling worlds and kill giant monsters, but also those who are looking for a deep, personal storyline — something that MMOs typically don’t deliver.

To that end, BioWare promises that The Old Republic will let you feel like the hero of your own personal Star Wars saga. The game features eight classes — you could choose to learn the ways of The Force as a Jedi knight, for example, or be a military man and concentrate on improving your skills with heavy artillery. BioWare says each of these classes will have “several hundred hours” of storyline.

Moreover, Old Republic will be the first MMO in which each and every line of dialog is fully voiced. That’s several hundred thousand lines of speech.

Publisher Electronic Arts will show two different types of demo for Star Wars: The Old Republic at its E3 booth this week: One in which you can team up with three other players and attempt a high-level boss fight, and one in which you can choose to try the opening missions of the game as a Level 1 character.

Knowing little about the ways of MMOs, I thought it prudent to spend my time at a pre-E3 preview event last month playing the simpler opening scene, taking the part of a hotshot lady trooper tasked with stopping some Separatist forces that had gotten hold of a cache of missiles.

(This turned out to be a good choice — the feeling that I got from the other writers at the event was that jumping feet-first into an MMO as a high-level character was confusing as hell.)

I didn’t have much time to think about whether I was a good guy or a bad guy or what. This all takes place 3,500 years before the movies, so are the Galactic Republic or the Separatists the good guys? Are there good guys? Eh, I’ll just do my job and try to be nice about it. So when my commander starts briefing me on the situation, I try not to mouth off too much, selecting from the dialog wheel the more pleasant options. For now. Maybe this guy will start to annoy me later.

Starting off a game of Old Republic feels similar to rolling a new character in World of Warcraft; you’re kept in a small area and given a few tasks that teach you the basics of the game. In this case, it’s a small military base that the Separatists are guarding; the first thing I end up doing is getting into a battle with a group of three of them. I quickly find out that I have a sweet bazooka sort of attack assigned to the “2″ key, so I hit that every time it recharges and I lob an explosive that takes down these early enemies in a single hit.

This depletes an ammo stock, but I also have a command that will let me stand still and replenish my health and ammo after a few seconds.

My main mission is to find and secure one of the crates of missiles, but as I kill guards, I find that this, too, is a quest; I get some bonus XP if I off 10 of them. So I do. Soon after, I find the missiles and report back to my commander. Now he wants me to go back out there and jam three communications stations, each of which is guarded and each of which is easily disabled by means of standing there while a timer ticks off.

Finally, I get to blow this opening area and head out toward a town, where I will surely find many more quests. A war is raging all around me as I depart, Separatist forces are out in the hills, sniping away at my Galactic brethren.

As I’m walking up the path, I run into another guy with a little speech bubble icon above his head. “A quest!” I think, and talk to him. He wants me to find and kill three of those snipers. I take the quest, and as it turns out I can find them and take them out on my way into town anyway. They’re hiding in bushes and such but not very well. Soon after, with about half an hour of play time under my belt, I reach the first town and quit the game.

As I said, I’m not an MMO person, but I have gone through the first couple hours of World of Warcraft: Cataclysm. In one sense, Old Republic felt a lot like that, in the way that it gave me a rapid-fire succession of quests and big XP bonuses to hook me into its carrot-on-a-stick compulsion loop.

The Old Republic’s cinematic approach to storytelling makes for a memorable experience.

The difference is, as BioWare said, in the new Star Wars game’s approach to storytelling. Playing Warcraft and trying to absorb all the story is like trying to read all of Wikipedia. Every time you start and finish a quest, you’re assaulted with giant pages full of tiny text. Old Republic’s cinematic, voiced, more-measured approach to storytelling made for a more memorable experience.

BioWare says if you want to play the entire game solo, pretending that it is just a very large single-player RPG, you can. But the developer’s aim is to tempt over the shut-ins, giving them alluring sidequests and content that can only be accessed with a group of players.

Whether fans will feel that Old Republic is an acceptable substitute for another offline RPG remains to be seen. But from my brief experience, I can see how it might achieve its goal of crafting a more appealing MMO story.

Chris Kohler is the founder and editor of Wired.com's Game|Life, and the author of Power-Up: How Japanese Video Games Gave the World an Extra Life. He will talk your ear off about Japanese curry rice.
Follow @kobunheat and @GameLife on Twitter.

Unforgiven review The Maltese Falcon review The Elephant Man review Oldboy review Mr Smith Goes to Washington review

Obama seeks $1.2 trillion debt limit rise (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama formally notified Congress on Thursday that he plans a $1.2 trillion increase in the U.S. debt limit, prompting Republicans to level election-year charges that deficits are out of control.

Obama, in a one-sentence letter to House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, said "further borrowing is required to meet existing commitments."

The proposed increase would push the debt ceiling to $16.394 trillion.

The move by the Democratic president, who is seeking re-election in November, gives Congress 15 days to vote on a resolution of disapproval under terms of budget control legislation passed last year.

Lawmakers are unlikely to muster the votes needed to block the boost in U.S. borrowing capacity, so a replay of last summer's debt limit drama that brought the federal government to the brink of default and cost the United States its top-tier credit rating is not expected.

But the increase notification does give Republicans an opportunity to paint Obama as a spendthrift during an election year in which taxes and spending are key issues. They quickly blamed him for a lack of progress in reducing deficits after congressional deficit reduction talks collapsed late last year.

"The President's runaway borrowing threatens the foundation of our economy and the financial future of every hardworking American," said Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

"It brings our nation closer to what the chairs of his own fiscal commission called 'the most predictable economic crisis in its history.'"

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Boehner, called Obama's request "another reminder that the President has consistently punted on the tough choices needed to rein in the deficit."

Obama originally intended to exercise his authority to raise the debt limit on December 30 but House and Senate leaders asked him to delay the move to allow lawmakers to consider it while they are back in session. House members reconvene in Washington next week.

To allow for the delay, the Treasury Department has had to turn to one of the measures it employed to keep the government afloat last summer - dipping into the Exchange Stabilization Fund, which has a dollar balance of about $22.7 billion.

A Treasury official said other measures, such as suspending the daily reinvestment of assets in a government pension fund, may also be needed until the debt-limit increase is secured.

Senator Orrin Hatch, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, asked Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in a letter to give details of the extraordinary measures being taken to stay under the limit, which has already been increased by $900 billion since last summer's debt brawl to $15.194 trillion.

(Additional Reporting by Matt Spetalnick and Aruna Viswanatha; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Goodfellas review Casablanca review City of God review The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring review Once Upon a Time in the West review

Ex-TechCruncher Launches Semantic Q&A Service Beepl

Beepl is a questions and answers service, which launches today. Co-founder/CEO and ex-TechCrunch blogger Steve O?Hear actually left TC to do this startup is convinced that Beepl can take on the the so-called Q&A field better than Quora. But how?

Unlike Quora where the questions come first and can thus make the service look quite chaotic, it?s Beepl?s aim to first find the experts in a subject who can answer the questions. It does this by applying its semantic engine to users? interests as surfaced through various social media profiles, such as their Facebook likes, LinkedIn skills and recent tweets, along with their explicit activity on Beepl itself. It?s the startup?s use of this semantic technology that makes it different from Quora. Instead of experts having to look for or follow a question, the questions essentially ?follow? the experts.

To continue the inevitable comparison to Quora, O?Hear told me that Beepl is more like social media rather than a wiki-type resource, ?so we don?t care if the same question is being asked again and again? he says. Why? Because the experts it surfaces are always changing and improving,so the answers can be ever more relevant.

The questions can be also asked on Twitter with a hash tag #ask and the answers are fed into Beepl and represent additional source of information. This function however has not yet been tested as Beepl was in a closed alpha up until now (it opens up today). The experts are awarded expertise points, but their PeerIndex or Klout scores are not taken into account. Perhaps that could change ? given that Beepl could become a social ranking for experts answering questions. We?ll see I guess.

Beepl raised $400,000 from Czech venture capital firm Credo Ventures last summer and is headquartered in London, but its R&D team is based in Prague, Czech Republic.

Meanwhile, Beepl is not alone in trying to improve the effectiveness of a Q&A services. In Poland a startup called Wisdio has recently raised $140,000 of seed money from local VCs and business angels. According to its founder and CEO Sebastian Zontek, the service aims to deliver questions to the right people taking into account their activity data on Wisdio, other social networks as well as their behavioural profiles.

 

 

 

 

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Wordpress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Stand by Me review The Wages of Fear review The Thing review Casino review How to Train Your Dragon review

GoBandit WiFi helmet cam hands-on

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Wordpress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Kind Hearts and Coronets review Let the Right One In review All Quiet on the Western Front review Ed Wood review Fanny and Alexander review

Gallery: Gamer Goes From Laptop to Le Mans

Gamer Goes From Laptop to Le Mans

<< Previous | Next >>
Lucas Ordonez at Stonehenge

Stonehenge at 5 a.m. is a strangely unnerving sight. The giant dolmens sit patiently: dark, brooding and ancient, as if awaiting the return of a long-forgotten deity. And then the silence is shattered by the roar of something sleek, black and frighteningly futuristic: a Nissan GT-R driven by Lucas Ordóñez.

The Spaniard is one of three drivers making a lap of England before the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Held June 11 and 12 this year, it's easily among the most prestigious races in all of motor sports.

Loose of limb and big of hair, he he hops from the supercar to greet me with a broad smile, as if an early-morning rendezvous at Britain?s most famous monument is the most normal thing in the world.

Ordóñez's story, and the reason we're here at Stonehenge, is anything but.

Above: Ancient meets modern at Stonehenge, as Lucas Ordóñez makes a stop during his 24-hour jaunt around England before the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Photo: Anthony Cullen

<< Previous | Next >>

Slumdog Millionaire review Heat review For a Few Dollars More review The Wizard of Oz review Touch of Evil review

Obama seeks $1.2 trillion debt limit rise (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama formally notified Congress on Thursday that he plans a $1.2 trillion increase in the U.S. debt limit, prompting Republicans to level election-year charges that deficits are out of control.

Obama, in a one-sentence letter to House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, said "further borrowing is required to meet existing commitments."

The proposed increase would push the debt ceiling to $16.394 trillion.

The move by the Democratic president, who is seeking re-election in November, gives Congress 15 days to vote on a resolution of disapproval under terms of budget control legislation passed last year.

Lawmakers are unlikely to muster the votes needed to block the boost in U.S. borrowing capacity, so a replay of last summer's debt limit drama that brought the federal government to the brink of default and cost the United States its top-tier credit rating is not expected.

But the increase notification does give Republicans an opportunity to paint Obama as a spendthrift during an election year in which taxes and spending are key issues. They quickly blamed him for a lack of progress in reducing deficits after congressional deficit reduction talks collapsed late last year.

"The President's runaway borrowing threatens the foundation of our economy and the financial future of every hardworking American," said Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

"It brings our nation closer to what the chairs of his own fiscal commission called 'the most predictable economic crisis in its history.'"

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Boehner, called Obama's request "another reminder that the President has consistently punted on the tough choices needed to rein in the deficit."

Obama originally intended to exercise his authority to raise the debt limit on December 30 but House and Senate leaders asked him to delay the move to allow lawmakers to consider it while they are back in session. House members reconvene in Washington next week.

To allow for the delay, the Treasury Department has had to turn to one of the measures it employed to keep the government afloat last summer - dipping into the Exchange Stabilization Fund, which has a dollar balance of about $22.7 billion.

A Treasury official said other measures, such as suspending the daily reinvestment of assets in a government pension fund, may also be needed until the debt-limit increase is secured.

Senator Orrin Hatch, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, asked Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in a letter to give details of the extraordinary measures being taken to stay under the limit, which has already been increased by $900 billion since last summer's debt brawl to $15.194 trillion.

(Additional Reporting by Matt Spetalnick and Aruna Viswanatha; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Rocky review Mary and Max review Big Fish review Magnolia review Manhattan review

Taiwan Nationalists have edge in early vote counts (Reuters)

TAIPEI (Reuters) – Taiwan's incumbent Nationalist president had a tiny edge on Saturday in early vote counts from an election that is being closely monitored by China and the United States as they look for stability in the region at a time of political transition.

The elections had been expected to be tight and television stations showed that with about 1 percent of the vote counted, the Nationalist Party's Ma Ying-jeou, 61, who has fostered warmer ties with China, was very slightly ahead of Tsai Ing-wen of the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).

Voting closed at 4 p.m. (0800 GMT). At one polling station in downtown Taipei, staff opened the beige ballot boxes and took out the pink presidential ballot slips, calling out the name of the chosen candidate and stacking the papers in piles for each candidate.

Full results are due later in the day.

Earlier, voters had queued up in orderly lines islandwide after polls opened at 8 a.m. (0000 GMT). The sky was overcast in the capital but it was relatively balmy, underlining hopes for a high turnout.

"I feel calm and hopeful," said Hwang Shiu-mei, a mother of three who was in line to vote at a booth in a Taipei market.

"I hope we can see a win-win situation with China in the coming four years. We don't want to see a stalemate and hope for a better economy, along with peace and stabilility."

Both main contestants were confident as they cast their vote early.

"I see a little sunshine now," Ma told reporters at his polling station in a Taipei church after a slight drizzle eased.

"I'm very happy, I urge everyone to come out early and vote. This weather should help the voting rate."

Asked if he had a restful night, Ma replied: "I sleep well every night."

Opposition leader Tsai, casting her ballot at a school in a Taipei suburb, said she was mentally prepared to become the first female president of Taiwan.

"I hope we will be able to give you a full explanation after the vote is counted," she said, when pressed for details.

SMOOTH VOTE

Like the run-up to the election, the voting was smooth. Unlike in 1996, when China fired missiles into waters off Taiwan before the island's first direct presidential election, Beijing has learnt to temper any response to avoid antagonizing voters into backing the DPP.

The DPP's independence-leaning stance has long angered Beijing, which deems Taiwan a renegade province and considers U.S. arms sales to the self-ruled island as the top obstacle to improved ties between the United States and China, now the world's two biggest economies.

Tsai has distanced the DPP from the independence stance. But a DPP victory could complicate matters for Chinese President Hu Jintao and other leaders who will hand power to a younger generation later this year and who don't want to jeopardize their legacy of fostering more stable cross-strait ties.

The United States, which holds presidential elections later this year, will also be keen to take a potential irritant in bilateral ties with China off the table.

In Taiwan, besides the presidential election, the 18 million eligible voters will also choose the island's 113-member parliament, currently dominated by the Nationalists, that will be crucial in expediting or stalling future policies.

Most analysts expect a high turnout given the closeness of the race. Nearly 200,000 Taiwanese have returned from overseas for the poll according to local media reports, cramming flights in a last minute rush to cast ballots.

Ma and Tsai, both former law academics with doctorates from Harvard and the London School of Economics respectively, held a flurry of rallies and motorcades islandwide on Friday, the final day of campaigning, with Ma focusing on the DPP's largely rural stronghold of the south and Tsai aiming north.

A third candidate, former Nationalist party member James Soong who now leads a splinter party, trails far behind in the polls but could cloud the result for the Nationalists by siphoning off some of Ma's support.

Some see the election as a referendum on the economic rapprochement with China shepherded by Ma over the last four years, that may have eased decades of animosity and the threat of outright war but raised fears of an over-reliance on its powerful neighbor.

However on the streets, livelihood issues dominate, especially at a time of global economic uncertainty for export-reliant Taiwan.

"We hope the new president can improve the economy," said Hsu Kuo-hsiung, a 49-year-old car mechanic as he polished a black sedan in his garage in a Taipei suburb.

"This is most important. If there's no stability, the economy will suffer."

(Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

The Battle of Algiers review The Diving Bell and the Butterfly review The Wild Bunch review In Bruges review True Grit review

GoBandit WiFi helmet cam hands-on

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Wordpress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Fanny and Alexander review 127 Hours review The Fighter review Rocky review Mary and Max review